Did they cave
in order
to save
the neediest
or
the greediest?
Was it brave
to behave
as though
moral clarity,
a Washington
rarity,
would be effective
from the perspective
of the “burn
it all down”
running
DC town?
If the concept
of the plan
was to intercept
the ban
on government
programs
that feed fams
that need
scaffolding,
their spoiler
alert
for the inert
seems
rather baffling.
The longest
government
shut down,
biblical
in sound,
40 days
and nights
of fights
with little
to show
for it all,
as health
care costs
will soon
balloon
without
the ACA
subsidy
extension.
The incomprehension
of many
a Democrat
is that
the 8 who
conceded
got nothing
they needed.
All they got
was a vote,
which will
likely be rote,
denying
affordable
health care.
Where the 8
stood
was understood
as caring
about those
most affected,
while they
are protected
from being
re-elected.
If the shut down
is ended
but ACA
breaks
not extended,
then will
the concession
stand?
Right now
it looks
feckless,
but against
the most
reckless
governing
party
in American
history,
ultimately,
the Republican
majority
in congress
will temporarily
halt progress
until
congress
will
flip for
the midterm.
Meanwhile
we squirm
while they
confirm
that air
travel
will not
unravel
for Thanksgiving.
This game
is shameless,
but certainly
not blameless,
and the blame
belongs
to the ones
who
use real
people
as pawns
for 40 dawns
or for
ever,
if they could.