(Don’t worry. No spoilers here.)
I love
documentaries.
They aim
to please
as they
freeze
history
or biography
telling stories
with a clear
ending.
But the
mind-bending
“You Can See
Everything”
can mean
almost
anything
about its
protagonists
(antagonists?),
including
the interviewer,
Nathan Fielder.
I won’t
reveal
the contents,
but the pretense
deserves
attention.
At 3 hours,
it could
be a marathon,
but no,
it’s more
like Rashomon
and a hall
of mirrors.
How much
is perception
duped
by deception?
How much
is left
to interpretation?
Is everything
a Rorschach
test?
And with
this quest
to get
to what’s
real,
performance
art
may still
conceal.
This unscripted
construct
may yet
instruct us
to see
differently.
Was Elizabeth
Holmes
misunderstood
before
or
after
this candid
camera
chapter?
Which actor
will win
the Oscar
for their
part
in this
masterful
work of
art?
“You Can See
Everything”
is entertaining
and challenging
in ways
I think
you’ll appreciate.
It will
demonstrate
how people
manipulate,
fascinate,
innovate,
machinate,
obfuscate,
impersonate,
sublimate,
understate,
collaborate,
complicate,
exacerbate,
conflate,
equate,
create,
and it makes
you think
for yourself.
It may
make you
nervous,
but that’s
the purpose
of this
art
in the service
of truth.
